Thursday, November 8, 2012

The Great Debate: Which is Better? On-site or Off-site Property Management? via Multifamily Blogs

Sorry folks, but the answer is: it depends! I know you hate that answer, but here's why it does really depend!

Engineer/Maintenance Staff: The number-one issue for any property manager to evaluate is whether or not there are on-site engineers or maintenance, or if they are in close proximity to the property. As far as what makes it really painful to be off-site, not having on-site maintenance or even a handyman can make or break the assignment. The worst case is to have no on-site maintenance and no on-site manager or leasing agent. This is generally accepted in the smaller properties where this expense is absolutely cost-prohibitive. The rule of thumb would be anything smaller than 20 units. Anything larger than 20 units and you need to consider extremely accessible, outsourced maintenance or a live-in superintendent of some type. It will always be to your advantage to have someone on-site to be a body when there is a service request or a vacant unit to lease. A single vacant unit can gobble up tons of labor in driving back and forth for showings. Also, it is not a good idea to make any prospective tenant wait to see a unit. In leasing, you have to be there to get the job done when the prospect wants to lease. That is probably why so many small properties are self-managed or the owner actually lives there!

For properties of 50 units and up, the following need to be considered as well:

Read more...The Great Debate: Which is Better? On-site or Off-site Property Management? - Multifamily Blogs

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.